↑ Trích dẫn này, và thực sự là bài phát biểu này, được đưa ra bởi đồng cố vấn của Darrow, Dudley Field Malone. Tác giả đương thời Anna Marcet Haldeman đã tuyên bố cụ thể, trong "Impressions of the Scopes Trial" (1925), "Chẳng hạn, Darrow sẽ không bao giờ bị phản bội, ngay cả bằng tài hùng biện của chính mình, khi nói như Malone: 'Không bao giờ có một cuộc đấu tay đôi với sự thật.' " [30]
↑ Edward J. Larson, Summer for the Gods: And America's Continuing Debate over Science And Religion (2006)
1 2 See Supreme Court of Tennessee John Thomas Scopes v. The State, at end of opinion filed January 17, 1927. The court did not address the question of how the assessment of the minimum possible statutory fine, when the defendant had been duly convicted, could possibly work any prejudice against the defendant.
↑ Scopes, John Thomas (1971), The world's most famous court trial, State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes; complete stenographic report of the court test of the Tennessee anti-evolution act at Dayton, July 10 to 21, 1925, including speeches and arguments of attorneys, New York: Da Capo Press, tr. 174–78, ISBN978-1-886363-31-1
↑ Scopes, John Thomas (1971), The world's most famous court trial, State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes; complete stenographic report of the court test of the Tennessee anti-evolution act at Dayton, July 10 to 21, 1925, including speeches and arguments of attorneys, New York: Da Capo Press, tr. 304, ISBN978-1-886363-31-1
↑ Arthur Garfield Hays, Let Freedom Ring (New York: Liveright, 1937), pp. 71–72; Charles Francis Potter, The Preacher and I (New York: Crown, 1951), pp. 275–76.
↑ The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was not, at the time of the Scopes decision in the 1920s, deemed applicable to the states. Thus, Scopes' constitutional defense on establishment of religion grounds rested—and had to rest—solely on the state constitution, as there was no federal Establishment Clause protection available to him. See Court's opinion. See generally Incorporation doctrine and Everson v. Board of Education (a seminal U.S. Supreme Court opinion finally applying the Establishment Clause against states in 1947).
Folsom, Burton W. Jr. (1988), “The Scopes Trial Reconsidered”, Continuity (12): 103–127, ISSN0277-1446
Gatewood, Willard B. Jr. biên tập (1969), Controversy in the Twenties: Fundamentalism, Modernism, & Evolution
Harding, Susan (1991), “Representing Fundamentalism: The Problem of the Repugnant Cultural Other”, Social Research, 58 (2): 373–393
Grabiner, J. V. & Miller, P. D. (September 6, 1974) "Effects of the Scopes Trial", Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4154, pp. 832–837
Ladouceur, Ronald P. (2008) "Ella Thea Smith and the Lost History of American High School Biology Textbooks", Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 435–471
Lienesch, Michael (2007), In the Beginning: Fundamentalism, the Scopes Trial, and the Making of the Antievolution Movement, University of North Carolina Press, tr. 350pp, ISBN978-0-8078-3096-3
Menefee, Samuel Pyeatt (2001), “Reaping the Whirlwind: A Scopes Trial Bibliography”, Regent University Law Review, 13 (2): 571–595
Simpson, George Gaylord (February 7, 1975) "Evolution and Education", Science Vol. 187, Issue 4175, pp. 389
Tompkins, Jerry R. (1968), D-Days at Dayton: Reflections on the Scopes Trial, Louisiana State University Press, OCLC411836
Đọc thêm
Ginger, Ray. Six Days or Forever?: Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes. London: OUP, 1974 [1958].
Haldeman-Julius, Marcet. "Impressions of the Scopes Trial". Haldeman-Julius Monthly, vol. 2.4 (Sept. 1925), pp. 323–347 (excerpt—included in Clarence Darrow's Two Great Trials (1927). Haldeman-Julius was an eye-witness and a friend of Darrow's.]
Scopes, John Thomas and William Jennings Bryan. The World's Most Famous Court Trial: Tennessee Evolution Case: A Complete Stenographic Report of the Famous Court Test. Cincinnati: National Book Co., ca. 1925.
Shapiro, Adam R. Trying Biology: The Scopes Trial, Textbooks, and the Antievolution Movement in American Schools. Chicago: UCP, 2013.
Shapiro, Adam R. "'Scopes Wasn't the First': Nebraska's 1924 Anti-Evolution Trial". Nebraska History, vol. 94 (Fall 2013), pp. 110–119.
The Church Case between Prof. Johannes du Plessis and the Dutch Reformed Church in Cape Town, South Africa, on February 27, 1930 – 1931, regarding the biblical chapter of Genesis and evolution, was a similar event. The Church lost its case. OCLC85987149
